Airlines & ATOs

Every pilot you send outside trains on someone else's balance sheet.

€300K+

a year is a common order of magnitude before travel; at roughly twenty pilots and external type-rating packages

Modular simulation architecture for mixed fleets: EASA/FAA-native stack, certifiable throughput on your schedule, and fleet types added as engineering modules, not a vendor queue every time the network changes.

Discuss Your Requirements
The Problem

The procurement cycle is slower than the rate of fleet change.

📋
RMT.0196 forces a capability rethink

Fixed-device thinking is giving way to capability signatures and task-to-tool alignment. If your architecture cannot evolve without a foreign vendor's queue, reassessment becomes expensive by definition.

💶
External ATO spend never shrinks with headcount

Type ratings and recurrent hours at dry-hire benchmarks build equity for a third-party training organisation, not for your operation. MCC and multi-crew programmes make simulation mandated infrastructure; the only question is who owns the hours.

🛫
Mixed fleets multiply vendor fragments

Each new type or avionics standard on a closed platform tends to mean another contract, another certification path, and another maintenance regime; instead of one coherent architecture.

The VOA Answer

Modular architecture, not another closed box with a logo.

Software, hardware, and electronics engineered by one team. Certification documentation is part of the design, not an afterthought. The category we occupy is next-generation modular simulation, not a Tier 1 capital stack and not a fixed-platform Tier 2 device.

Add aircraft types as modules where your programme allows; reduce greenfield procured for every fleet move

A320 software production-ready; further types through custom engineering when you need them

ARINC 429, AFDX, and proprietary avionics integration; in-house PCBs, no black-box dependency

Training throughput: certifiable hours on your roster, instructors on your scenarios; the IOS evolves without a foreign vendor ticket

EQTG/QTG-native workflows; evidence produced from the same stack you qualify

ROI conversation anchored in external spend vs. owned capacity; typical operator models show multi-year payback at scale

VOA.aero cockpit simulator hardware for airline and ATO training programmes
Next Step

How we work with you.

Choose the track that best matches your current situation.

Track 01
Platform Development

Full stack for operators building in-house capacity: fleet types, avionics integration, and qualification thread owned with you.

Track 02
Customisation & Fleet Expansion

You already have devices; we add types, refresh avionics, and extend modularly without assuming a clean-sheet purchase.

Track 03
Certification & Validation Support

Software updates and compliance documentation; no new hardware required when that is the right entry point.